Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Personality Theory Influencers

Introduction
As I started the fascinating volume titled Personality Theories by Barbara Engler, I discovered that from the start, there were several famous psychologists who greatly influenced every aspect of psychology. Their impact is so great that their names are still known by almost everybody in the modern world. Therefore, I decided that a short overview of each of the most influential, along with their psychological approaches, was in order. Allow me to present you with Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, Alfred Adler, B. F. Skinner, and Abraham Maslow.
Sigmund Freud
                In the year 1856, Sigmund Freud was born as the first child of a Jewish wool merchant living in Moravia.[1] Four years later, his family moved to Vienna where Freud lived until the Nazis took over the city in 1938. From a young age, Freud was a child prodigy in the eyes of his parents. They gave him his own room and he used oil lamps to study while the rest of the family was forced to content themselves with candles. In 1873, at age 17, Freud started in the field of medical studies at the University of Vienna and spent eight years there. He lingered over the topics that interested him, making numerous important discoveries even while in school, and it wasn’t until 1881 that he actually established his own practice as a clinical neurologist.
                Due to his profession, Freud saw many patients with neurotic disorders, and gradually, his interest in neurosis increased. He published his first book, The Interpretation of Dreams, in 1900 – but it was generally unknown at the time. In 1909, Freud traveled to the United States with his friend Carl Jung and they spoke at Clark University in Massachusetts.
                In the following years, Freud continued to create and perfect his theories of psychoanalysis. When he died in 1939 at age 83, he left behind 24 volumes of published works. According to my source, there is also a great deal of material that will not be released until sometime in this century. Whether or not this has yet happened, I do not know.[2]
                Let’s take a few minutes to delve deeper into what exactly Freud’s theories consisted of. Unfortunately, he never completed them – indeed, most of his works have an unfinished feel to them.
                One part of his theory was that humans sometimes subconsciously withhold a strong part of their emotion, especially a negative emotion. He believed that by putting patients under hypnosis, they would then subconsciously and without real thought, share these experiences, resulting in catharsis. This allowed the emotions to be released since they could not be naturally, and would restore peace to the neurotic tendencies of the person involved.
                Freud suggested a number of methods that could be used in his type of study, known as The Psychoanalytic Method of Assessment and Research. Part of this was free association – it’s relatively simple. The person undergoing the procedure is simply asked to verbalize what goes through their mind, however unpleasant it may be. These thoughts are then analyzed and deductions made. Another technique used was the interpretation of dreams and slips – of memory, the pen, or the tongue. We often see these as minor and entirely unimportant, but Freud considered them important and could draw elaborate conclusions from the combination of these two methods. It is from him that we derived the Freudian Slip.
                The concepts of Freud’s best known work are not the above – though they are also interesting and important. He also explored extensively into the ideas of sexuality and how it relates to the actions of a person. At the moment, I don’t wish to delve deeply into his theories in this area. However, Freud assigned stages of sexuality to children from birth to about age seven, and then again beginning around age 13 as they matured into adults. It is my personal belief that most of this is unfounded and unnecessary. However, it is for this work that Freud gained much of his popularity and fame.
                Freud also divided the personality into three parts – the id, the ego, and the superego. He called the id “the core of our being” and considered it to contain our drives and instincts, along with reflexes and psychic energy that powers all our psychological powers. According to Freud, the id is basically uncontrollable by us consciously, and presents itself in newborns, dreams, and some hallucinations. The ego shows itself in meeting the wants and needs of the id. It is here defined as the “intermediary between the id and the external world.” While the id follows something known as the “pleasure principle” (steered solely to find pleasure), the ego follows the “reality principle” (which curbs impulses and portrays the person properly to the real world). Finally, the superego is the center of the ego. It contains the conscience and ego-ideal (an “ideal self-image consisting of approved and rewarded behaviors”). It is the superego that strives for perfection – resulting in it striving towards moralistic over realistic solutions.
                Out of those three, according to Freud, the ego was the controller in a well-adjusted adult. However, since most people are not that “well adjusted,” often the id or the superego start steering the person. The latter “demands instant satisfaction and release” while the former “places rigid prescriptions on that release.” Clearly, being totally steered by either of those is a formidable thought. However, ultimately, relating any of these three of the forms of being conscious or unconscious is impossible. The simplest relation, though not the most accurate, would be to identify the ego with consciousness and the id with unconsciousness.
                Another study by Freud was about anxiety. He identified “reality anxiety” (a generally rational fear of a true danger in the external world); “neurotic anxiety” (fear that inner impulses will rage out of control); and “moral anxiety” (fear of the retributions of the conscience). Freud speculated that the ego developed defense mechanisms to fight against these anxieties. A few of the most well-known include repression (blocking something from expression); denial (refusing to believe something that is real); and projection (the unconscious laying of something unpleasant on another person, place, or object) among others.
                Ultimately, although Freud tested his own theories and discoveries, some of them have caved miserably under deeper scrutiny. So while they may be interesting ideas to consider, it would be unwise to entirely trust any of them without further research into the matter. Sigmund Freud was undoubtedly a unique and fascinating character.
Carl Jung
                Carl Jung was born in 1875 in the country where he spent his entire life, Switzerland. He was raised at first almost as only child – his sister was born when he was nine. So he spent a lot of time playing by himself. He was also a rather sickly child, who spent six months out of school at one point, due to fainting spells. Though he had originally longed to be an archaeologist, he couldn’t afford to go to school for it and instead attended the University of Basel and worked on a medical degree.
                While there, he at first planned to turn his degree towards working in surgery, but happened to read a textbook by a German neurologist. It piqued his curiosity, and his interest began to turn towards that work instead. Eventually, he arrived in Zurich, where he worked with a psychiatrist, and then later became a lecturer at the University of Zurich. He met Sigmund Freud in 1907 and was very impressed with him and his work. It was with him that he traveled to Clark University in the United States.
                However, by 1913, Jung and Freud had too many disagreements, especially on the matter of sexuality and its influence in psychological matters. Jung left Freud and his work, and eventually became engrossed in self-analysis. He continued on to develop analytical psychology and wrote extensively. He continued to research and write throughout his life. In 1961, Jung died, having changed fundamentally the thoughts of the world in relation to psychology.
                Jung saw the personality as “a complex network of interacting systems that strive toward eventual harmony.” However, he managed to make this complex network fairly understandable for any person. He split everything into two attitudes and four functions. The two attitudes were extraversion and introversion. These are differentiated by whether the person is oriented towards the outer or inner world. Were they more comfortable with the outer world of people and things or the inner world of concepts and ideas? This is what Jung asked.
                The four functions were sensation and intuition, and then thinking and feeling. The first two, sensation and intuition, were based off of how people gather their data and information. Those who are sensors use the five senses more and prefer facts and realities. Those who are intuitors tend more towards relationships and possibilities and meanings. Thinking and feeling are more about how people come to judgments and conclusions. Thinkers use logic and impersonal analysis, while feelers are more oriented towards personal values, attitudes, and beliefs. Jung’s theories allowed the two attitudes to be combined with the four functions for a total of eight different psychological types.
                Jung also thought and wrote about numerous other psychological aspects. For example, he coined the persona and the shadow. The persona is the mask that people wear to be acceptable in their society. It is “a compromise between one’s true identity and social identity.” Of course, one must not identify either too much or too little with the persona, for the consequences are either becoming entirely the persona or becoming asocial. The shadow is the unsocial thoughts and feelings that a person may have. One way to put it might be as the devil within. It is from the shadow that things like prejudice may arise. Jung “suggested a need to come to know our baser side and recognize our animalistic impulses.” He believed that it resulted in “dimension and credibility” and “increased zest for life.”
                Jung had numerous other theories that are more complicated than the ones detailed here, so for the present, I shall not expand on them. However, they are fascinating and I encourage my readers to pursue a deeper knowledge of them. One to note especially is that Jung was one of the first people to think of the word-association test frequently used today.
                His studies into neurotic psychology and psychoanalysis are more widely known than most people realize. For example, the MBTI test. MBTI stands for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. It was formed by Katherine Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers. It was created to make Jung’s ways of sorting people even simpler for the general population. It consists of four sections, each with two things, which can be combined in a total of 16 ways. They are: Extroversion-Introversion (represented by the letters EI); Sensing-Intution (SN); Thinking-Feeling (TF); and Judging-Perceiving (JP).
                One of the wonderful things about the MBTI test is that anyone can read through the definitions for each letter and probably choose one or the other that they identify with the most. The MBTI test comes in very handy for employers, as they can figure out how to work best with various personality types in the workplace. It also has applications in numerous other settings.
                Jung influenced our culture in many ways, both those that we realize and those that we may not. He was a person with a brilliant mind who contributed greatly to the world of psychoanalysis. While some of his theories and interests (in things like alchemy, dreams, and astrology) were a little strange, for the most part, many of his discoveries are still applicable today.

Alfred Adler
                Alfred Adler was born in 1870 as the second of six children. He had rickets at a young age, making him generally clumsy and awkward. Besides that, he was run over twice in the street, and later came down with pneumonia. It is little wonder that he described his childhood as unhappy and hard. School was not his forte, and his teacher suggested he become a shoemaker – but his perseverance paid off and eventually, Adler moved on to the top of his class, especially in such matters as math. In addition, he gained an appreciation for the company of others.
                Like Freud, Adler studied medicine at the University of Vienna. He centered at first on becoming an eye specialist, but he eventually became a practicing neurologist and psychiatrist instead. In 1902, he joined an elite group brought together by Freud to discuss psychoanalysis. Adler later became the first president of the group, named Vienna Psychoanalytic Society.[3] Unfortunately, by 1911, Adler disagreed deeply with some of Freud’s psychoanalytic views, and along with about a third of the society, he left the group. He went on to be a soldier in World War I, and then to assist the government in child guidance establishments in Vienna. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, he continued to practice in Vienna – the same place as Freud, but they avoided each other.
                In 1935, Adler moved to the United States, working as a professor of medical psychology at the Long Island College of Medicine. In addition, he maintained his own private practice of neurology and spoke in many places. He was on a tour in Scotland, speaking across the land, when he had a heart attack and died. It was 1937 and he was only 67 years old.
                Adler had a special import to lay on the effects of human culture and society on the individual human. He called it “social interest” – this denoted the want held by humans to adapt to whatever is accepted in their culture. Adler also believed that everything any human ever did was aiming towards some goal, every thought, feeling, and action. He called this pursuing of a goal “finalism.” Beyond this goal-driven mindset, Adler theorized that the human psyche has a built-in “goal of superiority,” in which we strive constantly to be made whole. Contrary to how it may sound to us, the goal of superiority is not to be better than all our peers, but to be good and competent at what we do.
                Four groups of people were coined by Adler, four groups of people who strove for the goal of superiority. They included ruling type (who were aggressive people with little care for those around them); the getting type (people who take but do not give); the avoiding type (people who try to avoid the problems of life and most human interaction); and the socially useful type (the people with “a great deal of social interest and activity”). Unsurprisingly, he called three of these the “mistaken styles”.
                One very interesting area that Adler studied was birth order. While he didn’t go into stages of development as Freud was fond of doing, he did hypothesize about the difference made by “family constellation,” or the position of a person within the family structure according to birth order. He decided that “older children tend to be more intelligent, achievement oriented, conforming, and affiliative.” They generally have more interest in power, and in the past. Second or middle children are more likely to feel a need to catch up with their older sibling. This makes them often competitive and motivated. Lastborn children are often “more sociable and dependent, having been the ‘baby’ of the family.” However, they may become competitive in order to pass their older siblings. Care must be taken to not spoil or pamper the youngest child. Adler was the one who fully created a theory of sibling rivalry. Often only children tend to be most like oldest children – they spend more time in the company of adults, and enjoy being the center of attention. Adler also warned, however, that often only children are the most likely to be pampered, and stated that pampering was “the greatest curse of childhood.”
                While the dynamics of the family constellation change by the family, the gender of the children, and the number of years in between them (among other factors), there is some solid truth to what Adler concluded. Sibling rivalry is very real, no matter the size of the family. Oldest children can be quite stereotypical, as can each of the others. Adler stated that family atmosphere does make a difference in determining the ultimate temperament of a person.
                Adler considered his concept of “creative self” to be the greatest accomplishment of his life, and the climax of his theories. To put it concisely, “the creative self establishes, maintains, and pursues the goals of the individual.” Adler’s theory on this matter only reinforced his belief that “human nature is essentially active, creative, and purposeful in shaping its response to the environment.” He believed that we were conscious of what we do, unlike Freud and Jung, and could control ourselves and understand ourselves quite well.
                It was Adler who coined the terms “inferiority complex” and “superiority complex.” Both of these refer to how a person may respond to either real or imaginary feelings of inferiority or superiority. He believed that people used these complexes as a way to protect themselves from often unreasonable fears.
                Alfred Adler was a brilliant man who made several ground-breaking discoveries and theories over the course of his lifetime. While some of his theories may have not been entirely concrete, they have contributed greatly to our culture today. Without him, it would have been much later before the links between personality and birth order, among other important topics, were discovered.
B. F. Skinner
                B. F. Skinner, born Burrhus Frederick Skinner, was the child of a lawyer and his wife. Born in 1904 in small town Pennsylvania, he grew up in a peaceful home that was endowed with the ethics and morals of America. As a child, Skinner was brilliant, inventing a number of electrical machines. In addition, he harbored an interest in animal behavior, a study which served him well later in life. However, when he went away to Hamilton College, his major was English. At first, he longed to be a writer – but when he decided to take a few years to work on his writing, he soon became frustrated and chose to instead pursue further degrees at Harvard and work on graduate studies in psychology. He earned his Ph. D. in 1931.
                Following that momentous event, Skinner went on to teach at the University of Minnesota for nine years and then to be the chairman of the psychology department at Indiana University before going back to Harvard in 1948. By that time, he had become a well-known psychologist and wrote an influential book, titled Walden II. He died in 1990 from leukemia. He was 86 years old.
                Skinner did not focus on the inner aspects of personality, but on the impact made by the environment on the personality. One example given is that rather than trying to figure out how hungry a person is, Skinner would try to determine what variables and outside effects would affect that hunger. To this means, he would ask questions such as “when was the last meal eaten?” and “what are the consequences of the amount of food consumed?”
                However, what Skinner is known best for is probably his theories concerning the development of behavior through learning. One of his key words was “reinforcement.” Anything that makes someone or something want to repeat a specific behavior is a positive reinforcer. Skinner also noted the difference between two types of behavior, respondent and operant. The former are behaviors that are in direct response to a stimulus – for example, a reflex. Operant behavior is a response that is not necessarily replying to a stimulus. In other words, it is made freely.
                Skinner also used a method known as shaping to get the behavior results he wanted from the animals he worked with. This involved providing reinforcements that helped to mold the animal’s behavior. This created a belief in Skinner that most or all human behavior is made by operant conditioning. He went on to experiment with numerous other types of reinforcements as well.
                Along with Sigmund Freud, B. F. Skinner was one of the most controversial psychological theorists to ever exist. His beliefs about behavior, conditioning, and shaping have changed the way our culture thinks about important issues. In addition to that, some of his practices have been implemented in mental institutions and rehabilitation centers, used to help the patients behave in acceptable ways.
Abraham Maslow
Abraham Maslow was born in 1908 in Brooklyn, New York. His heritage was Jewish and he was the first of seven children. It was early in his life that Maslow began delivering newspapers. Sadly, he wasn’t close with either of his parents. He liked his father well enough, but was also afraid of him. His mother seemed to hate him, favoring his younger siblings constantly. The only love that was consistently given to Maslow was from one of his uncles, who devoted time and energy to him regularly.
Maslow did well in the public schools in which he grew up, and after graduating, began going to the City College of New York. At the time, his father compelled him to study law and his grades fell, due in vast part to his lack of interest. Eventually he went to the University of Wisconsin. About the same time, he married the girl he truly loved, to the disappointment and disapproval of his parents. Maslow went on to earn his Ph. D. there in 1934, and then returned to New York to work as a research assistant and then a professor at Brooklyn College. In 1951, Maslow went on to teach instead at Brandeis University, and stayed there for 19 years. It was in 1970 that Maslow died, having established something that would be become well-known throughout American culture, known as Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.
Maslow categorized the needs of every human as B-needs and D-needs. The latter were deficiency needs; the former were being needs. The latter had to be satisfied before the former could be. The needs were as follows: physiological needs; safety needs; belonging and love needs; self-esteem needs; and self-actualization needs (which were the only B-needs). He stated that the first listed needs, the biggest D-needs, had to be satisfied before the other needs could be considered. Physiological needs are the needs for “food, drink, sleep, oxygen, shelter, and sex.” If these needs are not satisfied, the others cannot be. After them come the safety needs, which are often seen most clearly in children and people who live in an unsafe environment. Insecurities arise when the need for safety is not met. Then come the belonging and loving needs – the need for love, affection, and trust in relationships. These needs can be difficult to fulfill in a culture that has so much of life in a digital form.
The next two needs can be slightly more difficult to understand: the D-need of self-esteem and the B-need of self-actualization. The self-esteem need has two parts – “the need for respect from others and the need for self-respect.” If these needs are not met, often feelings of discouragement, inferiority, and weakness will follow. “Healthy self-esteem is a realistic appraisal of one’s capacities and has its roots in deserved respect from others.” The final need, for self-actualization, is the hardest to encapsulate. It is easier to describe a person who has been self-actualized.
Maslow tended to move more towards philosophy than merely the actual definitions of “pure science.” Indeed, “theories that entail self-actualization deal primarily with issues of moral philosophy rather than psychological science.” He also tended, especially near the end of his life, to have more of an interest in spiritual and religious things than many scientists do.
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs is widely known and remarkably popular. Whether or not it was an entirely accurate hierarchy is debatable in some circles. However, it has certainly influenced the world of science in the modern day.
Conclusion
Men like Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, Alfred Adler, B. F. Skinner, and Abraham Maslow have all had a great deal of influence on the world of psychology. While clearly some of their “findings” and beliefs were entirely off-base, each of them is also fascinating to study and things can be learned from them. They were brilliant men with impressive brains – however, they were men and sometimes went astray.


[1] Moravia is a small town in the country that later became Czechoslovakia. This later divided into the Czech Republic and Slovakia; Moravia is in the Czech Republic.
[2] The book was published in 1995.
[3] Eventually this group became what is known as the International Psychoanalytic Association.

No comments: